Skip to main content

Gibbs Free Energy & Equilibrium Calculator (ΔG = −RT ln K)

Explore the relationship between Gibbs free energy and equilibrium. Convert between ΔG° and K, and between ΔG and Q. See whether reactions are spontaneous or equilibrium-favored under given conditions.

Standard State Quantities (optional)

Standard Gibbs free energy change per mole of reaction as written

Use scientific notation for large/small values (e.g., 1e-14)

Actual Condition Quantities (optional)

Gibbs Free Energy & Equilibrium Calculator

Enter a temperature and at least one of ΔG°, K, ΔG, or Q to explore the relationships between Gibbs free energy and equilibrium.

ΔG° = −RT ln K

Connects standard Gibbs free energy to the equilibrium constant. When ΔG° < 0, K > 1 (products favored).

ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q

Connects current free energy to composition. When ΔG < 0, the forward reaction proceeds spontaneously.

Spontaneity

ΔG < 0: Forward reaction is spontaneous. ΔG > 0: Reverse reaction is spontaneous. ΔG = 0: At equilibrium.

Equilibrium Position

K ≫ 1: Products strongly favored. K ≪ 1: Reactants strongly favored. K ≈ 1: Significant amounts of both.

Note: K and Q should be treated as dimensionless activity ratios. This tool is for educational purposes only.

ΔG° = −RT ln K Derivation

If you're computing Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constants and your K comes out negative, something went wrong—K is always positive. The relationship ΔG° = −RT ln K connects standard free energy change to the equilibrium constant, and it falls out of the definition of ΔG under standard conditions. At equilibrium, ΔG = 0. The general expression ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q reduces to 0 = ΔG° + RT ln K (since Q = K at equilibrium). Rearranging gives ΔG° = −RT ln K.

The units demand attention. R = 8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ gives ΔG° in joules. If your thermodynamic tables list ΔG° in kJ/mol, convert before plugging in: either multiply ΔG° by 1000 or use R = 0.008314 kJ·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹. Mixing J and kJ is the most frequent arithmetic error in this calculation and makes K wrong by e¹⁰⁰⁰ instead of e¹—off by hundreds of orders of magnitude.

The exponential relationship means small changes in ΔG° produce enormous changes in K. At 298 K, every 5.7 kJ/mol decrease in ΔG° multiplies K by 10. So ΔG° = −5.7 kJ/mol gives K ≈ 10, ΔG° = −11.4 gives K ≈ 100, and ΔG° = −57 gives K ≈ 10¹⁰. This steep sensitivity is why tabulated ΔG° values need several significant figures to be useful for calculating K.

Spontaneity from ΔG Sign

A negative ΔG means the forward reaction is thermodynamically favorable at those specific conditions. It can proceed without external energy input. But "favorable" is not the same as "fast" or "complete." Diamond combustion to CO₂ has ΔG° = −397 kJ/mol at 298 K—overwhelmingly favorable—yet diamonds persist for billions of years because the activation energy is enormous. Thermodynamics says the reaction can happen; kinetics says it won't happen at any useful rate.

A positive ΔG means the reverse reaction is favored. Students often say "the reaction won't happen," which is wrong. It means the forward reaction is not spontaneous at those conditions—the reverse direction is favored. The system still reaches equilibrium, but with more reactants than products. A positive ΔG° of +10 kJ/mol gives K = exp(−10000/(8.314 × 298)) = exp(−4.04) = 0.018. The reaction does proceed—just not very far.

When ΔG = 0 (not ΔG°, but actual ΔG at current conditions), the system is at equilibrium. No net change occurs. This is the point where Q = K. The sign of ΔG tells you which direction the system will move from its current state, while the sign of ΔG° tells you which side of unity K falls on (products or reactants favored at standard conditions).

ΔG vs ΔG° Under Non-Standard Q

ΔG° is a single number for a reaction at a given temperature—all species at standard-state activity (1 M for solutes, 1 bar for gases). Real mixtures almost never match standard state, so you need ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q to find the actual driving force. The RT ln Q correction shifts ΔG up or down depending on where Q sits relative to K.

When Q is very small (nearly pure reactants), ln Q is large and negative, making ΔG more negative than ΔG°. The reaction has a stronger driving force forward than the standard value suggests. When Q is very large (nearly pure products), ln Q is large and positive, making ΔG more positive. The reaction pushes backward even if ΔG° is negative. This is how a reaction with a favorable ΔG° can still be unfavorable under specific conditions—you've loaded the system with too many products.

At equilibrium, ΔG = 0, which means RT ln Q = −ΔG°, which means Q = K. This is the connection point between the two equations. ΔG° tells you K. Q tells you where you are. ΔG tells you which way you'll move. Students who substitute K into the Q position of the ΔG equation always get ΔG = 0—that's correct but trivially true and doesn't answer any useful question.

Temperature Dependence of K

Temperature is the only variable that changes K itself. Concentration changes shift Q, not K. Pressure changes shift Q (for gas-phase reactions), not K. Catalysts change rate, not K. But raise or lower the temperature, and K moves.

The direction depends on ΔH. For an exothermic reaction (ΔH < 0), heating decreases K—products become less favored. For an endothermic reaction (ΔH > 0), heating increases K—products become more favored. This follows from the van't Hoff equation: ln(K₂/K₁) = −(ΔH/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁). If ΔH is negative and T₂ > T₁, the right side is negative, so K₂ < K₁.

The van't Hoff equation assumes ΔH is roughly constant over the temperature range. For narrow ranges (say 298 to 350 K), this is usually fine. Over hundreds of degrees, ΔH itself changes with temperature (because heat capacities of products and reactants differ), and you need the Kirchhoff equation to correct ΔH before plugging into van't Hoff. For a general chemistry course, the constant-ΔH approximation is standard. For physical chemistry, you'll integrate Cp.

Thermodynamics Q&A

Why does ΔG = ΔH − TΔS sometimes predict spontaneity wrong? It doesn't—if you use the right temperature. ΔG° values from tables assume 298 K. Using them at 500 K gives the wrong ΔG° because ΔH° and ΔS° themselves change with temperature. Either recalculate ΔH° and ΔS° at the new temperature using heat capacity data, or use ΔG = ΔH − TΔS with the understanding that ΔH and ΔS are approximate at temperatures far from 298 K.

Can ΔG° be zero? Yes. It means K = 1 exactly. At standard conditions, neither products nor reactants are favored. The system reaches equilibrium with roughly equal amounts of each (adjusted for stoichiometry). This is a special case, not an error.

What about biochemistry's ΔG°'? Biochemical standard state uses pH 7 ([H⁺] = 10⁻⁷ M) instead of the thermodynamic standard of [H⁺] = 1 M. Since many biological reactions involve H⁺, this matters enormously. ΔG°' for ATP hydrolysis is about −30 kJ/mol at pH 7, but ΔG° (at [H⁺] = 1 M, which is pH 0) would be quite different. Always check which standard state your data uses.

Does a more negative ΔG° always mean a faster reaction? No. ΔG° relates to equilibrium position (K), not rate. Rate depends on activation energy (Ea), which is entirely separate. A reaction with ΔG° = −200 kJ/mol but Ea = 300 kJ/mol is extremely favorable but painfully slow. Thermodynamics and kinetics answer different questions.

Gibbs-K Relationship

• Standard relationship: ΔG° = −RT ln K. Negative ΔG° → K > 1 (products favored). Positive ΔG° → K < 1 (reactants favored). ΔG° = 0 → K = 1.

• Non-standard correction: ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q. Actual driving force depends on current concentrations/pressures through Q. At equilibrium, ΔG = 0 and Q = K.

• Temperature dependence: ΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS°. Exothermic + entropy gain → spontaneous at all T. Endothermic + entropy loss → non-spontaneous at all T. Mixed signs → depends on T, crossover at T = ΔH°/ΔS°.

• van't Hoff: ln(K₂/K₁) = −(ΔH°/R)(1/T₂ − 1/T₁). Predicts how K shifts with temperature. Assumes constant ΔH° over the range.

• Unit check: R = 8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ when ΔG° is in J/mol. Use R = 0.008314 kJ·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ when ΔG° is in kJ/mol. Never mix J and kJ.

Calculating K from ΔG° Run

Problem: The decomposition of N₂O₄(g) ⇌ 2 NO₂(g) has ΔH° = +57.2 kJ/mol and ΔS° = +175.8 J/(mol·K). Find K at 298 K and at 400 K.

At 298 K:

ΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS°

ΔG° = 57200 − (298)(175.8) = 57200 − 52388 = +4812 J/mol

K = exp(−ΔG°/RT) = exp(−4812 / (8.314 × 298))

K = exp(−1.94) = 0.14

At 400 K:

ΔG° = 57200 − (400)(175.8) = 57200 − 70320 = −13120 J/mol

K = exp(−(−13120) / (8.314 × 400))

K = exp(+3.95) = 52

Crossover temperature:

T = ΔH°/ΔS° = 57200 / 175.8 = 325 K (52 °C)

At 298 K, K = 0.14 (reactants slightly favored—ΔG° is positive). At 400 K, K = 52 (products strongly favored—ΔG° flipped negative). The crossover at 325 K is where K = 1 and ΔG° = 0. This reaction is endothermic with positive ΔS, so heating helps—the TΔS term eventually overwhelms the unfavorable ΔH. Notice all calculations used ΔG° in J/mol with R = 8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹. Converting ΔS from J to kJ first would have avoided that issue entirely.

Sources

Troubleshooting ΔG Calculations and Equilibrium Predictions

Real questions from students stuck on unit conversions, ΔG° vs ΔG°′, why K ≪ 1 reactions still proceed, and how to couple unfavorable processes.

I calculated ΔG = −15 kJ/mol but my reaction barely moved—what's stopping it?
ΔG tells you thermodynamics (can it happen?), not kinetics (how fast?). Your reaction is favorable—it will proceed eventually—but the activation energy barrier may be enormous. Think of a boulder on a hill: thermodynamically it should roll down (ΔG < 0), but if it's stuck in a small dip, it won't move without a push. Diamond to graphite has ΔG° = −2.9 kJ/mol, yet diamonds last forever at room temperature. You need a catalyst or higher temperature to overcome the activation barrier. ΔG says 'yes, it's favorable,' kinetics says 'maybe in a million years.'
My textbook uses ΔG° but my biochemistry course uses ΔG°′—are they interchangeable?
No, they're different standard states. ΔG° uses thermodynamic standard state: 1 bar, 1 M, pH 0, typically 25°C. ΔG°′ uses biochemical standard state: 1 bar, 1 M except [H⁺] = 10⁻⁷ M (pH 7), often 37°C for biological relevance. For reactions involving H⁺, the difference can be huge—ATP hydrolysis is about −30 kJ/mol at pH 7 but different at pH 0. Always check which convention your data uses. Biochemistry tables almost always give ΔG°′; thermodynamic tables give ΔG°. Mixing them in the same calculation gives nonsense.
I got K = 10⁻⁸ but the problem says the reaction still happens—how can products form when K is so tiny?
K tells you equilibrium position, not whether products form at all. Even K = 10⁻⁸ means the ratio [products]/[reactants] = 10⁻⁸ at equilibrium—products are present, just at very low concentration. Also, ΔG (not ΔG°) determines spontaneity at current conditions. If you start with pure reactants (Q ≈ 0), then Q < K, so ΔG < 0 and reaction proceeds forward until Q = K. The reaction 'still happens'—it just doesn't go very far. Some product always forms; K tells you how much.
I entered R = 8.314 with ΔG in kJ/mol and got K = 10²⁰—that seems way too big. What went wrong?
Unit mismatch. R = 8.314 has units J/(mol·K), but your ΔG is in kJ/mol. You're effectively multiplying by 1000 in the exponent. Use R = 0.008314 kJ/(mol·K) when ΔG is in kJ, or convert ΔG to J/mol first. If ΔG° = −50 kJ/mol and you use R = 8.314, you get K = exp(50000/(8.314×298)) ≈ exp(20200) ≈ infinity. The correct calculation: K = exp(50/(0.008314×298)) ≈ exp(20.2) ≈ 6×10⁸. Off by a factor of 10⁸⁰⁰⁰—unit errors are catastrophic in exponentials.
My ΔG° is positive (+10 kJ/mol), but at current concentrations I calculated ΔG = −5 kJ/mol. Did I mess up?
Not necessarily. This is completely valid—it happens when Q is much smaller than K. Positive ΔG° means K < 1 (reactants favored at equilibrium), but if your current Q is even smaller than K, the system is below equilibrium and will shift toward products. ΔG = ΔG° + RT ln Q, so if Q is very small, ln Q is large and negative, making ΔG negative even when ΔG° is positive. Example: ΔG° = +10 kJ/mol gives K ≈ 0.02. If Q = 0.001, then Q < K, so forward reaction is spontaneous despite the unfavorable ΔG°.
Why does increasing temperature sometimes make K bigger and sometimes make it smaller?
It depends on ΔH° (enthalpy change). The van't Hoff equation says d(ln K)/dT = ΔH°/RT². For endothermic reactions (ΔH° > 0), the derivative is positive—K increases with temperature, products become more favored. For exothermic reactions (ΔH° < 0), the derivative is negative—K decreases with temperature, reactants become more favored. Think of it thermodynamically: heating an endothermic reaction supplies the energy it needs; heating an exothermic reaction fights against heat release. This calculator assumes fixed temperature—for temperature effects, you need ΔH° and the van't Hoff equation.
I'm trying to calculate Q but I have partial pressures in atm, not bar—does it matter?
Usually no, because 1 atm ≈ 1.013 bar—close enough for most calculations. But technically, the IUPAC standard state since 1982 is 1 bar, not 1 atm. If you're comparing to ΔG° values from modern tables (1 bar standard), using atm introduces a small error. For high-precision work or when standard state matters (gas-phase equilibria near 1 bar), convert: P(bar) = P(atm) × 1.01325. For classroom calculations with significant figures of 2–3, the difference rarely matters.
My professor says K is dimensionless, but I see Kp with units of bar² and Kc with units of M—which is right?
Both are approximations. The true thermodynamic K is dimensionless—a ratio of activities. When we write Kp = P_products/P_reactants with actual pressures, we're implicitly dividing by the standard pressure (1 bar), making it dimensionless: Kp = (P/P°). Same for Kc with concentrations (divided by 1 M). The 'units' you see are shorthand reminders of what quantities are being ratioed. For calculations involving ln K (like ΔG° = −RT ln K), K must be dimensionless—otherwise ln(bar²) makes no sense mathematically.
I want to drive an unfavorable reaction (ΔG > 0) forward—how do I couple it to ATP hydrolysis in this calculator?
Coupling means adding ΔG values for reactions that share a common intermediate. If your unfavorable reaction has ΔG°′ = +15 kJ/mol and ATP hydrolysis has ΔG°′ = −30 kJ/mol, the coupled reaction has ΔG°′_net = −15 kJ/mol (favorable). But this only works if there's a physical mechanism linking them—an enzyme active site, a shared intermediate, or a coupled membrane process. You can't just add ΔG values for unrelated reactions. The calculator handles single reactions; for coupled systems, add ΔG values manually for the overall process.
My NIST data says ΔH°f and S°, not ΔG° directly—how do I get ΔG° from formation values?
Use ΔG° = ΔH° − TΔS° where ΔH° = Σ(ΔH°f products) − Σ(ΔH°f reactants) and ΔS° = Σ(S° products) − Σ(S° reactants). Make sure ΔH° and TΔS° have the same units—ΔH°f is usually kJ/mol, S° is usually J/(mol·K). For ΔS°, multiply by T (in K), then divide by 1000 to convert to kJ. At 298 K: ΔG° = ΔH° − (298)(ΔS°)/1000 in kJ/mol. Alternatively, if your table gives ΔG°f directly, use ΔG° = Σ(ΔG°f products) − Σ(ΔG°f reactants). Both methods give the same answer if the data is internally consistent.

Explore More Chemistry Calculators

Master thermodynamics, equilibrium, stoichiometry, acid-base chemistry, and more with our comprehensive chemistry calculator suite

Browse All Chemistry Tools
Gibbs Free Energy - Convert K, Q and Delta G