Skip to main content

Balance Cut vs Fill and Reduce Haul Costs

Define cut zones and fill zones with average depths and plan areas. The calculator totals each side, shows the net balance, and estimates how much soil must be imported or exported along with optional haul costs.

Loading calculator...

Last updated: February 16, 2026

The Bid Said “Balanced”—Then the Import Trucks Kept Coming

A grading contractor eyeballs the topo, counts roughly equal areas of high and low ground, and tells the owner the site is balanced—no import, no export. Halfway through the job the fill zones are still short. The cut produced 600 bank cubic yards, but soil swells when you dig it and shrinks when you compact it. The real cut and fill arithmetic left a 180-yard gap nobody accounted for—forty extra truckloads and a $9,000 change order.

This calculator takes your cut zones and fill zones, applies swell and shrinkage factors, converts everything into the same volume state, and tells you whether you need to bring material in or haul it out. It does not replace a topographic survey—it gives you a planning-grade answer before the dozers show up.

Bank, Loose, Compacted—Why the Same Dirt Has Three Different Volumes

Dirt in the ground sits at its bank volume (BCY)—packed by years of settlement. Scoop it into a truck and air gaps form; the pile is now bigger, measured as loose volume (LCY). Compact it with a roller and it squeezes into a smaller compacted volume (CCY) denser than the original bank state.

Loose = Bank × Swell Factor (excavated soil expands)

Loose Needed = Compacted ÷ Shrink Factor (you need extra loose volume to hit target density)

Net Balance = Loose Cut − Loose Fill Needed

Positive → excess, export required. Negative → deficit, import required. Zero → balanced, nothing leaves the property.

Comparing bank cut to compacted fill directly is the most common earthwork mistake. Convert both sides to loose yards first, then subtract. That one step separates a clean budget from a surprise trucking bill.

How Much Soil Swells and Shrinks: Factor Ranges by Material

Swell measures how much bigger the pile gets once it leaves the ground. Shrink measures how much it compresses when rolled into a fill pad. Both depend on material type and moisture.

MaterialSwell factorShrink factorField note
Sand / gravel1.10–1.150.90–0.95Low swell, compacts easily; best reuse material on site
Loam / topsoil1.20–1.300.85–0.90Moderate swell; strip first and stockpile for finish grade
Clay1.30–1.500.80–0.90High swell; moisture-sensitive and hard to compact wet
Blasted rock1.50–1.800.70–0.80Highest swell; rarely qualifies as structural fill
Mixed site soil (default)1.250.90Reasonable starting point when no geotech data exists

A geotech report for your site is always better than a table. But for early pricing, these ranges keep you realistic. Using 1.25 for clay instead of 1.40 on 1,000 bank yards under-counts loose volume by 150 yards—ten truckloads and $3,000 nobody budgeted.

Three Zones, Two Factors, One Bottom Line

Site: Residential pad prep. Zone A (parking cut): 500 yd³ bank. Zone B (utility trench cut): 200 yd³ bank. Zone C (building pad fill): 800 yd³ compacted target. Swell factor: 1.25. Shrink factor: 0.90. Import cost: $25/yd³. Truck capacity: 14 yd³.

  • Loose cut — Zone A: 500 × 1.25 = 625 LCY
  • Loose cut — Zone B: 200 × 1.25 = 250 LCY
  • Total loose cut: 625 + 250 = 875 LCY
  • Loose fill needed — Zone C: 800 ÷ 0.90 = 889 LCY
  • Net balance: 875 − 889 = −14 LCY (deficit—import needed)
  • Import: 14 yd³ ≈ 1 truckload, 14 × $25 = $350

Raw numbers suggest a 100-yard deficit (700 bank cut vs 800 fill). Factor conversions reveal the real gap is only 14 yards—one truck, not seven. Without the conversion the contractor over-orders by six loads, wasting about $2,100.

Why Haul Distance Can Matter More Than Net Balance

A net balance near zero looks perfect on paper. But soil still has to travel from cut to fill. On a long site—road work, pipeline corridor—haul distance drives cost more than volume. Pushing 500 yards 200 ft with a loader is nearly free; trucking the same 500 yards two miles costs almost as much as importing fresh material from a pit next door.

Net balance answers the first question: import or export? Haul optimization—which zone feeds which, in what order—is the second, and it requires a mass-haul diagram this tool does not produce. For planning budgets, net balance plus a per-yard cost is close enough. For bid day, get the full haul analysis.

Four Earthwork Surprises That Wreck the Budget

  • Rock hiding below the cut line. The geotech log says “soil over weathered rock at 4 ft.” Your cut averages 5 ft. That bottom foot swells at 1.5–1.8, not the 1.25 you assumed for soil—adding 25–50 % more loose volume than planned. Worse, blasted rock rarely qualifies as structural fill, so the surplus leaves the property instead of feeding a fill zone.
  • Wet clay that shrinks past the estimate. Clay at optimum moisture compacts around a 0.85 shrink factor. After a week of rain it absorbs water, swells in the cut, then squeezes below 0.80 when dried and rolled. The fill zone suddenly needs 10–15 % more loose material than the dry-weather number. A site that balanced on paper becomes a deficit site after one storm.
  • Cut material that fails the fill specification. Organic topsoil, expansive clay, and contaminated soil cannot go under a building pad. The balance shows “export 200 yards,” but if 300 yards of cut is unsuitable you export 300 and import 100—a completely different cost picture.
  • Disposal fees nobody included in the bid. Dump sites charge tipping fees ($8–$25 per yard), some require soil testing before acceptance, and a 30-mile round trip sets the trucking rate. A 200-yard export at $15/yard material cost can jump to $35/yard all-in once tipping and trucking are added. Budget the full chain, not just the dirt price.

Where This Tool Stops and an Engineer Starts

The calculator multiplies zone area by average depth, applies swell and compaction factors, and subtracts fill demand from cut supply in loose cubic yards. It does not model irregular topography, cross-section grids, haul routes, or material suitability. Conversions use 1 yd³ = 27 ft³. For any project that requires a grading permit, get a topographic survey and geotechnical report before locking in quantities.

Need to figure out how many truckloads of fill to order once you know the deficit? Run the fill volume calculator. Checking whether the finished grade drains properly? Try the slope and grade calculator. Planning a retaining wall where cut meets fill? Use the retaining wall estimator.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is cut and fill in earthwork?

Cut and fill is an earthwork process where soil is excavated from high areas (cut) and moved to low areas (fill) to create level surfaces or desired grades for construction, roads, and landscaping. The goal is often to balance cut and fill volumes to minimize the need to import or export soil from the site. Cut volumes are measured in bank cubic yards (BCY) before excavation, while fill volumes are measured in compacted cubic yards (CCY) after placement. Understanding cut and fill is fundamental to site preparation, construction planning, and earthwork cost estimation. This calculator helps you estimate cut and fill volumes, calculate net mass balance, and determine import/export requirements for planning purposes.

What is a bulking factor (swell factor)?

A bulking factor (also called swell factor) accounts for the expansion of soil when it is excavated from its natural, in-situ state. Soil in the ground is compacted naturally over time, but when dug up, it becomes loose and takes up more volume. A bulking factor of 1.25 means the soil expands by 25% when excavated (1,000 BCY becomes 1,250 LCY). Different soil types have different bulking factors: sand/gravel (1.10–1.15, low swell), loam/topsoil (1.20–1.30, moderate swell), clay (1.30–1.50, high swell), blasted rock (1.40–1.80, very high swell). The default of 1.25 is reasonable for average conditions, but for critical projects, get a geotechnical report that provides site-specific values based on actual soil testing. Understanding bulking factors is essential for accurate mass balance calculations.

What is a compaction factor (shrinkage factor)?

A compaction factor (also called shrinkage factor) accounts for the compression of loose soil when it is placed as fill and compacted to required density. When fill material is rolled and compacted with equipment, it reduces in volume. A compaction factor of 0.90 means the loose fill shrinks by 10% when compacted (889 LCY needed to achieve 800 CCY). This means you need more loose material than the final compacted volume. Compaction factors typically range from 0.80 to 0.95: sand/gravel (0.90–0.95, low shrinkage, compacts easily), loam/topsoil (0.85–0.90, moderate shrinkage), clay (0.80–0.90, high shrinkage, moisture sensitive). The default of 0.90 works for many conditions, but your project specifications may dictate required compaction percentages. Understanding compaction factors is essential for accurate mass balance calculations.

What do BCY, LCY, and CCY mean?

These are standard earthwork volume measurements representing soil in different states: BCY (Bank Cubic Yards) is the in-situ volume before excavation—the natural, undisturbed state compacted by years of settlement. LCY (Loose Cubic Yards) is the volume after excavation when the soil is loose and expanded due to bulking/swell. CCY (Compacted Cubic Yards) is the volume after the soil is placed and compacted as fill to required density. For the same physical amount of soil: LCY > BCY (due to bulking), and CCY varies based on the original state and compaction requirements. The relationship: LCY = BCY × Bulking Factor, and Loose Fill Needed = CCY ÷ Compaction Factor. Understanding these volume states is crucial for accurate mass balance calculations because net balance must compare volumes in the same state (typically LCY).

How do I know if my site is balanced?

A site is balanced when the bulked cut volume (LCY) equals the loose fill needed (LCY) after accounting for compaction. To determine balance: (1) Calculate bulked cut: LCY Cut = BCY Cut × Bulking Factor, (2) Calculate loose fill needed: LCY Fill Needed = CCY Fill ÷ Compaction Factor, (3) Calculate net balance: Net Balance = LCY Cut − LCY Fill Needed. If net balance is positive, you have excess material to export. If negative, you have a deficit and need to import soil. If zero, the site is balanced (no import/export needed). This calculator shows the net balance after applying bulking and compaction factors, helping you understand your site's balance status. Balanced sites minimize costs by avoiding expensive import/export operations.

Why does importing/exporting soil matter for cost?

Importing or exporting soil significantly increases project costs and should be minimized when possible. Import costs typically range from $15–50 per cubic yard depending on soil type, distance, and local market conditions. These costs include: material purchase (if importing), trucking and hauling, placement and compaction labor, equipment rental. Export costs typically range from $15–40 per cubic yard for hauling and disposal fees, including: excavation and loading, trucking to disposal site, disposal fees (landfill, recycling facility), environmental permits (if required). A balanced site (cut equals fill after adjustments) avoids these costs entirely. Additionally, import/export operations add time to project timelines, increase fuel consumption and emissions, and may require permits in some jurisdictions. Understanding cost impact helps you prioritize balanced site design.

How accurate is this calculator?

This calculator provides rough planning estimates based on simplified assumptions: uniform average depths per zone, user-provided bulking and compaction factors, zone-based volume calculations. Actual volumes can vary 10–30% or more due to: irregular topography (not captured by average depths), varying soil conditions (bulking/compaction factors vary across site), moisture content (affects soil volume and compaction), organic material and debris (not accounted for), compaction methods (different equipment achieves different densities), survey accuracy (depends on survey method and frequency). For accurate estimates, use: professional topographic surveys (precise existing and proposed elevations), geotechnical reports (site-specific bulking and compaction factors), detailed zone breakdowns (more zones improve accuracy), contractor bids (experienced earthwork contractors provide realistic estimates). This tool is for planning and education only, not professional engineering or final construction estimates.

What bulking factor should I use?

Bulking factors vary by soil type and should be selected based on your specific site conditions. Common bulking factors: sand/gravel (1.10–1.15, low swell, compacts easily), loam/topsoil (1.20–1.30, moderate swell, average conditions), clay (1.30–1.50, high swell, moisture sensitive), blasted rock (1.40–1.80, very high swell, irregular shapes). The default of 1.25 (25% expansion) is reasonable for average conditions and works well for initial planning estimates. However, for critical projects or when accuracy is important, get a geotechnical report that provides site-specific values based on actual soil testing. Geotechnical engineers test soil samples to determine precise bulking factors for your specific site, accounting for soil composition, moisture content, and other factors. Using accurate bulking factors improves mass balance calculation accuracy.

What compaction factor should I use?

Compaction factors typically range from 0.80 to 0.95 and depend on soil type and compaction requirements. Common compaction factors: sand/gravel (0.90–0.95, low shrinkage, compacts easily to high density), loam/topsoil (0.85–0.90, moderate shrinkage, standard compaction), clay (0.80–0.90, high shrinkage, moisture sensitive, may require special compaction methods). The default of 0.90 (10% shrinkage) works for many conditions and is a good starting point for planning estimates. However, your project specifications may dictate required compaction percentages (e.g., 95% Standard Proctor density), which affects the compaction factor. Higher compaction requirements (lower compaction factor, more shrinkage) may be needed for structural fill, building pads, or road bases. For accurate values, consult project specifications or geotechnical reports. Using appropriate compaction factors ensures accurate fill volume calculations.

Can I use cut material as fill?

Not all cut material is suitable for fill, and suitability depends on the cut material's properties and the fill application requirements. Suitable cut material: well-graded granular soils (sand, gravel) are excellent for structural fill, building pads, and road bases. Unsuitable cut material: topsoil and organic material are not appropriate for structural fill (may decompose and settle), expansive clays may not be suitable for building pads (may swell/shrink with moisture), contaminated soil must be disposed of properly (environmental regulations), debris and large rocks may need processing or removal. A geotechnical engineer can determine what on-site material can be reused and what must be disposed of, based on: soil testing (grain size, plasticity, organic content), fill application requirements (structural fill vs. general fill), project specifications (compaction requirements, bearing capacity), environmental regulations (contamination, disposal restrictions). Understanding material suitability helps you plan earthwork operations effectively.

How do I calculate earthwork volumes from survey data?

To calculate earthwork volumes from survey data, you need existing ground elevations and proposed design elevations. Common methods include: (1) Grid method—divide site into uniform grid cells, calculate elevation difference at each intersection, multiply average difference by cell area, sum all cells. Best for relatively flat sites. (2) Cross-section method—establish cross-sections at regular intervals, calculate cut/fill areas for each section, apply average end-area formula: Volume = (Area1 + Area2) / 2 × Distance. Best for linear projects (roads, pipelines). (3) Digital terrain model (DTM)—use software to create 3D models of existing and proposed surfaces, calculate volume difference automatically. Most accurate for complex topography. This calculator uses simplified zone-based approach (area × average depth) for planning estimates. For accurate volumes, use professional topographic surveys and engineering software. Understanding calculation methods helps you interpret survey data and tool results.

Related Tools

Ready to Explore More Development Tools?

Calculate FAR/FSI capacity, estimate retaining wall volumes, analyze land grading slopes, and explore comprehensive land development planning with our suite of calculators.

How helpful was this calculator?

Cut-and-Fill Calculator: Mass Balance + Haul