Skip to main content

Logistic Regression Simple Predictor

Set coefficients and input features to see how logistic regression converts them into probabilities and classifications. This is a demonstration tool for learning — not for real-world decisions.

Last Updated: November 24, 2025

Understanding Logistic Regression: Binary Classification and Probability Prediction

Logistic regression is a fundamental statistical method for binary classification—predicting outcomes that have exactly two possible values (yes/no, pass/fail, spam/not spam, disease/no disease). Unlike linear regression, which predicts continuous numeric values, logistic regression predicts the probability that an observation belongs to a particular class. The key insight is using the sigmoid (logistic) function to transform any real-valued linear combination into a probability between 0 and 1. This tool demonstrates how logistic regression makes predictions by showing how coefficients, features, and the sigmoid function combine to produce probability estimates. Whether you're a student learning machine learning, a researcher analyzing binary outcomes, a data analyst building classification models, or a business professional evaluating risk, understanding logistic regression enables you to make informed predictions and decisions based on probability estimates.

For students and researchers, this tool demonstrates practical applications of binary classification, probability prediction, and the sigmoid function. The logistic regression calculations show how linear predictors, sigmoid transformations, and classification thresholds combine to produce predictions. Students can use this tool to verify homework calculations, understand how different coefficients affect probability predictions, explore concepts like log-odds and odds ratios, and see how the S-shaped sigmoid curve relates to probability changes. Researchers can apply logistic regression to analyze binary outcomes, estimate probabilities with uncertainty quantification, understand coefficient interpretation, and explore how feature values influence predictions. The visualization helps students and researchers see how probabilities change as features vary, making abstract concepts concrete and intuitive.

For business professionals and practitioners, logistic regression provides essential tools for decision-making and risk analysis. Data analysts use logistic regression for credit scoring, predicting loan defaults based on income, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio. Marketing professionals use logistic regression for churn prediction, identifying customers likely to cancel subscriptions. Healthcare professionals use logistic regression for medical diagnosis, predicting disease presence based on symptoms and test results. Quality control engineers use logistic regression for defect prediction, identifying products likely to fail quality tests. Operations managers use logistic regression for A/B test analysis, comparing conversion rates between variants. Security professionals use logistic regression for spam detection, classifying emails as spam or not spam based on content features.

For the common person, this tool answers practical probability questions: What's the probability of an event given certain conditions? How do different factors influence the likelihood of an outcome? The tool calculates probabilities for binary outcomes, showing how features combine to produce predictions. Taxpayers and budget-conscious individuals can use logistic regression to understand probability estimation, evaluate risk factors, assess decision thresholds, and make informed choices based on probability predictions. These concepts help you understand how to predict binary outcomes and make decisions under uncertainty, fundamental skills in modern data-driven decision-making.

⚠️ Educational Tool Only - Not for Real Decisions

This calculator is strictly for educational purposes. The coefficients you enter are hypothetical values for demonstration. In real applications, coefficients are estimated from training data using maximum likelihood estimation, validated on held-out data, and have uncertainty (confidence intervals). Never use this tool for real medical, financial, legal, hiring, or consequential decisions. Real logistic regression models require proper training data, model validation, feature engineering, assessment of assumptions, and domain expertise.

Understanding the Basics

Logistic Regression vs. Linear Regression

Linear regression predicts continuous numeric values (like price, temperature, or income), while logistic regression predicts the probability of a binary outcome (like yes/no, pass/fail, or spam/not spam). Linear regression uses a straight line to model relationships, while logistic regression uses the sigmoid function to constrain outputs between 0 and 1, making it suitable for classification tasks. Linear regression assumes errors are normally distributed, while logistic regression assumes outcomes follow a binomial distribution. Linear regression minimizes sum of squared errors, while logistic regression maximizes likelihood. The key difference is that logistic regression models probabilities, not continuous values, making it ideal for binary classification problems.

The Sigmoid Function: Transforming Linear Predictors to Probabilities

The sigmoid function σ(z) = 1 / (1 + e^(-z)) transforms any real number z into a value between 0 and 1, which can be interpreted as a probability. It's smooth, differentiable (important for optimization), and has a natural interpretation: large positive z values give probabilities near 1, large negative z values give probabilities near 0, and z = 0 gives exactly 0.5. The sigmoid function has an S-shaped curve (logistic curve), with the steepest slope at z = 0. The function is symmetric around (0, 0.5), and its derivative is σ'(z) = σ(z) × (1 - σ(z)), which is maximum at z = 0. For numerical stability, when z ≥ 0, we compute 1 / (1 + e^(-z)), and when z < 0, we compute e^z / (1 + e^z) to avoid overflow.

The Linear Predictor: Combining Features with Coefficients

The linear predictor z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + ... + βₙxₙ combines input features with their coefficients. β₀ is the intercept (log-odds when all features are zero), and β₁, β₂, ..., βₙ are coefficients for features x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ. The linear predictor can range from -∞ to +∞, representing the log-odds of the positive class. Positive coefficients increase the probability of class 1, while negative coefficients decrease it. The magnitude of coefficients indicates the strength of the effect—larger absolute values mean stronger effects. The linear predictor is then transformed through the sigmoid function to produce a probability between 0 and 1.

Log-Odds (Logit Function): The Link Between Linear Predictor and Probability

Log-odds (or logit) is the natural logarithm of the odds ratio: logit(p) = log(p / (1-p)). We use it because it transforms probabilities (bounded 0-1) into an unbounded scale (-∞ to +∞), allowing us to model them with a linear combination of features. The logistic regression directly models the log-odds as a linear function: logit(p) = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + ... + βₙxₙ. This means the linear predictor z equals the log-odds. To convert log-odds back to probability, we use the inverse logit (sigmoid) function: p = 1 / (1 + e^(-z)). The log-odds interpretation is intuitive: positive log-odds mean probability > 0.5, negative log-odds mean probability < 0.5, and log-odds = 0 means probability = 0.5.

Interpreting Coefficients: Effect on Log-Odds and Probability

Each coefficient βᵢ represents the change in log-odds for a one-unit increase in feature xᵢ, holding other features constant. The intercept β₀ is the log-odds when all features are zero. Positive coefficients increase the probability of class 1, while negative coefficients decrease it. The magnitude indicates the strength of the effect—larger absolute values mean stronger effects. However, the effect on probability is not linear—it depends on the current probability value. The effect is largest when the probability is near 0.5 and smallest when the probability is near 0 or 1. This is because the sigmoid function has the steepest slope at z = 0 (p = 0.5) and flattens out at the extremes.

Odds Ratios: Multiplicative Effect on Odds

The odds ratio for a coefficient is e^β, which represents how much the odds multiply for each one-unit increase in the feature. Odds = p / (1-p), so if the probability is 0.8, the odds are 0.8 / 0.2 = 4 (4:1 in favor). If β = 0.5, then OR = e^0.5 ≈ 1.65, meaning a one-unit increase multiplies the odds by 1.65 (65% increase in odds). If β = -0.3, then OR = e^(-0.3) ≈ 0.74, meaning a one-unit increase multiplies the odds by 0.74 (26% decrease in odds). An odds ratio of 1 means no effect, OR > 1 means increased odds, and OR < 1 means decreased odds. Odds ratios are often more interpretable than coefficients, especially in medical and social science applications.

Classification Threshold: Converting Probabilities to Predictions

The classification threshold determines how probabilities are converted to binary predictions. The default threshold is 0.5: classify as class 1 if p ≥ 0.5, else classify as class 0. However, the optimal threshold depends on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives. Lower the threshold (e.g., 0.3) when missing positives is costly (medical diagnosis, fraud detection). Raise the threshold (e.g., 0.7) when false positives are costly (spam detection with important emails, loan approval). In practice, you'd use ROC curves, precision-recall curves, or cost-sensitive analysis to choose the optimal threshold. The threshold doesn't affect the probability calculation—it only affects the final classification decision.

The Three-Step Prediction Process

Logistic regression prediction involves three steps: (1) Compute the linear predictor z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + ... + βₙxₙ, (2) Transform through the sigmoid function to get probability p = σ(z) = 1 / (1 + e^(-z)), (3) Apply the classification threshold to get the predicted class: ŷ = 1 if p ≥ threshold, else ŷ = 0. The linear predictor combines features with coefficients, the sigmoid function constrains the output to [0, 1], and the threshold converts probability to a binary decision. This process is deterministic—given the same inputs and coefficients, you always get the same probability and prediction.

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Use This Tool

Step 1: Choose Input Mode (2 or 3 Features)

First, choose whether you want to use 2 or 3 input features. Two inputs (X₁ and X₂) are sufficient for simple models, while three inputs (X₁, X₂, and X₃) allow you to explore how multiple factors interact. More features allow you to model scenarios where the outcome depends on multiple independent variables—like predicting loan default based on income, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio. Choose the mode that matches your scenario or learning objective.

Step 2: Enter Model Coefficients

Enter the intercept (β₀) and coefficients (β₁, β₂, and optionally β₃). These are hypothetical values for demonstration—in real applications, coefficients are estimated from training data using maximum likelihood estimation. The intercept is the log-odds when all features are zero. Each coefficient represents the change in log-odds for a one-unit increase in its corresponding feature. Positive coefficients increase probability, negative coefficients decrease it. The magnitude indicates the strength of the effect.

Step 3: Enter Feature Values

Enter values for your input features (X₁, X₂, and optionally X₃). These represent the characteristics of the observation you want to predict. For example, if predicting loan default, X₁ might be income, X₂ might be credit score, and X₃ might be debt-to-income ratio. Make sure your feature values are in the same units and scale as the coefficients were estimated for (if using real coefficients). The tool will compute the linear predictor by multiplying each feature by its coefficient and summing with the intercept.

Step 4: Set Classification Threshold

Set the classification threshold (default is 0.5). This determines how probabilities are converted to binary predictions: classify as class 1 if p ≥ threshold, else classify as class 0. Lower the threshold when missing positives is costly (medical diagnosis), raise it when false positives are costly (spam detection). The threshold doesn't affect the probability calculation—it only affects the final classification decision. Experiment with different thresholds to see how they affect predictions.

Step 5: Calculate and Review Results

Click "Calculate" or submit the form to compute the prediction. The tool displays the linear predictor (z), the predicted probability (p), the log-odds, and the predicted class. Review the interpretation summary to understand what the results mean in your specific scenario. The linear predictor shows the log-odds before sigmoid transformation, the probability shows the final prediction probability, and the predicted class shows the binary classification based on the threshold.

Step 6: Visualize the Sigmoid Curve (Optional)

Optionally, generate a chart showing how the predicted probability changes as one feature varies while others stay constant. Select which feature to vary (X₁, X₂, or X₃), set the range (min and max values), and specify the number of steps. The chart shows the characteristic S-shaped sigmoid curve, demonstrating how probabilities change non-linearly as features vary. The threshold line shows where the classification switches from 0 to 1. This visualization helps you understand the relationship between features and probabilities.

Formulas and Behind-the-Scenes Logic

Linear Predictor Calculation

The linear predictor combines features with coefficients:

For 2 inputs: z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂

For 3 inputs: z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + β₃x₃

Range: z ∈ (-∞, +∞)

The linear predictor is computed by multiplying each feature by its coefficient and summing with the intercept. This value can range from -∞ to +∞, representing the log-odds of the positive class. Positive values indicate log-odds > 0 (probability > 0.5), negative values indicate log-odds < 0 (probability < 0.5), and z = 0 indicates log-odds = 0 (probability = 0.5). The linear predictor is then transformed through the sigmoid function to produce a probability.

Sigmoid Function Calculation (Numerically Stable)

The sigmoid function transforms the linear predictor to a probability:

Standard formula: p = σ(z) = 1 / (1 + e^(-z))

Numerically stable (z ≥ 0): p = 1 / (1 + e^(-z))

Numerically stable (z < 0): p = e^z / (1 + e^z)

The sigmoid function is computed using numerical stability considerations. When z ≥ 0, we compute 1 / (1 + e^(-z)) to avoid overflow from e^(-z) when z is large and negative. When z < 0, we compute e^z / (1 + e^z) to avoid overflow from e^(-z) when z is large and positive. This ensures accurate probability calculations for any value of z. The sigmoid function produces values in (0, 1), with p → 0 as z → -∞, p = 0.5 when z = 0, and p → 1 as z → +∞.

Log-Odds Calculation

Log-odds is computed from the probability:

Formula: log-odds = log(p / (1-p))

Numerically stable: Clamp p to [ε, 1-ε] before computing

Range: log-odds ∈ (-∞, +∞)

Log-odds is computed by taking the natural logarithm of the odds ratio p / (1-p). For numerical stability, the probability is clamped to [ε, 1-ε] (where ε = 1e-9) before computing the log-odds to avoid log(0) or log(∞) when p is exactly 0 or 1. The log-odds should equal the linear predictor z (since logit(p) = z), providing a consistency check. Log-odds can range from -∞ to +∞, with positive values indicating probability > 0.5 and negative values indicating probability < 0.5.

Classification Decision

The predicted class is determined by comparing probability to the threshold:

Decision rule: ŷ = 1 if p ≥ threshold, else ŷ = 0

Default threshold: 0.5

Range: threshold ∈ (0, 1)

The classification decision is made by comparing the predicted probability to the classification threshold. If p ≥ threshold, the observation is classified as class 1 (positive); otherwise, it's classified as class 0 (negative). The default threshold is 0.5, but it can be adjusted based on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives. The threshold doesn't affect the probability calculation—it only affects the final binary classification. Lower thresholds increase sensitivity (catch more positives), while higher thresholds increase specificity (avoid false positives).

Worked Example: Loan Default Prediction

Let's predict loan default probability using income and credit score:

Given: β₀ = -5.0, β₁ = 0.01 (income in $1000s), β₂ = 0.05 (credit score), x₁ = 50 (income $50k), x₂ = 700 (credit score), threshold = 0.5

Step 1: Compute Linear Predictor

z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ = -5.0 + 0.01 × 50 + 0.05 × 700

= -5.0 + 0.5 + 35.0 = 30.5

Step 2: Apply Sigmoid Function

p = σ(30.5) = 1 / (1 + e^(-30.5)) ≈ 1.000 (very high probability)

Step 3: Compute Log-Odds

log-odds = log(p / (1-p)) ≈ log(1.000 / 0.000) ≈ 30.5 (matches z)

Step 4: Classification Decision

p = 1.000 ≥ 0.5, so ŷ = 1 (predict default)

Interpretation:

With income $50k and credit score 700, the model predicts a very high probability of default (≈100%). The positive linear predictor (z = 30.5) indicates high log-odds, which the sigmoid function transforms to a probability near 1. This is classified as class 1 (default) using the 0.5 threshold. Note: This example uses hypothetical coefficients for demonstration—real models would be trained on historical data.

This example demonstrates how logistic regression combines features with coefficients to produce probability predictions. The linear predictor (z = 30.5) represents high log-odds, which the sigmoid function transforms to a probability near 1. The classification decision compares this probability to the threshold (0.5) to produce a binary prediction. The example shows how higher income and credit score (with positive coefficients) increase the probability of the positive class (default in this case, though typically we'd model "no default" as the positive class).

Practical Use Cases

Student Homework: Understanding Probability Prediction

A student needs to understand how logistic regression predicts probabilities. Using the tool with β₀ = -2.0, β₁ = 0.5, β₂ = -0.3, x₁ = 3, x₂ = 2, threshold = 0.5, the tool calculates z = -2.0 + 0.5×3 + (-0.3)×2 = -2.0 + 1.5 - 0.6 = -1.1, p = σ(-1.1) ≈ 0.250, and ŷ = 0. The student learns that the linear predictor combines features with coefficients, the sigmoid function transforms it to a probability, and the threshold converts probability to a binary prediction. This helps them understand how logistic regression makes predictions step by step.

Credit Scoring: Loan Default Prediction

A data analyst evaluates a loan application with income $60k and credit score 650. Using hypothetical coefficients β₀ = -4.0, β₁ = 0.02 (income in $1000s), β₂ = 0.03 (credit score), with x₁ = 60, x₂ = 650, threshold = 0.5, the tool calculates z = -4.0 + 0.02×60 + 0.03×650 = -4.0 + 1.2 + 19.5 = 16.7, p = σ(16.7) ≈ 0.999, and ŷ = 1. The analyst learns that the model predicts a very high probability of default (≈99.9%). Note: This uses hypothetical coefficients—real models would be trained on historical loan data with proper validation.

Medical Diagnosis: Disease Prediction

A healthcare researcher evaluates disease probability based on age and test result. Using hypothetical coefficients β₀ = -3.0, β₁ = 0.05 (age), β₂ = 2.0 (test result), with x₁ = 65, x₂ = 1.5, threshold = 0.3 (lower threshold for medical diagnosis), the tool calculates z = -3.0 + 0.05×65 + 2.0×1.5 = -3.0 + 3.25 + 3.0 = 3.25, p = σ(3.25) ≈ 0.963, and ŷ = 1. The researcher learns that the model predicts a high probability of disease (≈96.3%), and with the lower threshold (0.3), it's classified as positive. Note: This uses hypothetical coefficients—real medical models require extensive validation and regulatory approval.

Common Person: Understanding Probability Estimation

A person wants to understand how different factors influence probability predictions. Using the tool with β₀ = 0.0, β₁ = 1.0, β₂ = -0.5, x₁ = 1, x₂ = 2, threshold = 0.5, the tool calculates z = 0.0 + 1.0×1 + (-0.5)×2 = 0.0 + 1.0 - 1.0 = 0.0, p = σ(0.0) = 0.500, and ŷ = 1 (since p = 0.5 ≥ 0.5). The person learns that when the linear predictor is zero, the probability is exactly 0.5, and positive/negative coefficients increase/decrease probability. This helps them understand how logistic regression estimates probabilities based on feature values.

Business Professional: Churn Prediction

A marketing manager evaluates customer churn probability based on usage and support tickets. Using hypothetical coefficients β₀ = -1.5, β₁ = -0.1 (usage hours), β₂ = 0.5 (support tickets), with x₁ = 20, x₂ = 3, threshold = 0.5, the tool calculates z = -1.5 + (-0.1)×20 + 0.5×3 = -1.5 - 2.0 + 1.5 = -2.0, p = σ(-2.0) ≈ 0.119, and ŷ = 0. The manager learns that the model predicts a low probability of churn (≈11.9%), classified as no churn. Note: This uses hypothetical coefficients—real churn models would be trained on historical customer data.

Researcher: Exploring Coefficient Effects

A researcher compares how different coefficients affect predictions. With fixed x₁ = 2, x₂ = 1, they try: (1) β₁ = 1.0 gives z = 2.0, p ≈ 0.881, (2) β₁ = 2.0 gives z = 3.0, p ≈ 0.953, (3) β₁ = 0.5 gives z = 1.0, p ≈ 0.731. The researcher learns that larger coefficients produce larger linear predictors and higher probabilities, demonstrating how coefficient magnitude affects predictions. The effect is non-linear due to the sigmoid function—the same increase in z has a larger effect on probability when p is near 0.5 than when p is near 0 or 1.

Understanding Threshold Effects

A user explores how different thresholds affect classifications. With p = 0.65, they try: (1) threshold = 0.5 gives ŷ = 1, (2) threshold = 0.7 gives ŷ = 0, (3) threshold = 0.3 gives ŷ = 1. The user learns that lower thresholds increase sensitivity (more positives classified), while higher thresholds increase specificity (fewer false positives). The threshold choice depends on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives. This demonstrates how threshold selection affects classification decisions without changing the underlying probability prediction.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Using This Tool for Real Decisions

Never use this tool for real medical, financial, legal, hiring, or consequential decisions. This is strictly an educational tool with hypothetical coefficients. Real logistic regression models must be trained on data using maximum likelihood estimation, validated on held-out data, and have uncertainty (confidence intervals). Real models require proper training data, model validation, feature engineering, assessment of assumptions, and domain expertise. Always use validated statistical software and consult domain experts for important decisions.

Confusing Logistic Regression with Linear Regression

Don't confuse logistic regression with linear regression. Linear regression predicts continuous values (like price or temperature), while logistic regression predicts probabilities for binary outcomes (like yes/no or pass/fail). Logistic regression uses the sigmoid function to constrain outputs between 0 and 1, while linear regression can produce any real value. The assumptions, optimization methods, and interpretation of coefficients are different. Always use logistic regression for binary classification problems, not linear regression.

Misinterpreting Coefficients as Direct Probability Changes

Don't interpret coefficients as direct changes in probability—they represent changes in log-odds. A coefficient of 0.5 means a one-unit increase in the feature increases log-odds by 0.5, not probability by 0.5. The effect on probability depends on the current probability value—it's largest when p ≈ 0.5 and smallest when p is near 0 or 1. Use odds ratios (e^β) for more intuitive interpretation, or compute the actual probability change for specific scenarios. Always remember that the relationship between features and probability is non-linear due to the sigmoid function.

Using the Wrong Threshold Without Considering Costs

Don't always use the default threshold of 0.5 without considering the relative costs of false positives and false negatives. Lower the threshold when missing positives is costly (medical diagnosis, fraud detection), raise it when false positives are costly (spam detection, loan approval). In practice, use ROC curves, precision-recall curves, or cost-sensitive analysis to choose the optimal threshold. The threshold doesn't affect the probability calculation—it only affects the final classification decision. Always consider the specific context and costs when choosing a threshold.

Assuming Coefficients Are Always Estimated from Data

In this educational tool, coefficients are user-provided hypothetical values. In real applications, coefficients are estimated from training data using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which finds coefficient values that maximize the probability of observing the training data. The estimation process also produces standard errors and confidence intervals for each coefficient. Don't assume that manually-entered coefficients represent real relationships—they're for demonstration only. Real models require proper training, validation, and statistical inference.

Ignoring Model Assumptions and Limitations

Don't ignore the assumptions and limitations of logistic regression. The model assumes: (1) observations are independent, (2) the log-odds is a linear function of features, (3) no perfect multicollinearity, and (4) sufficient sample size. The model may not be appropriate if these assumptions are violated. Real applications require model diagnostics (ROC curves, calibration plots, residual analysis), assessment of assumptions, and consideration of alternative models (non-linear relationships, interactions, regularization). Always validate your model and understand its limitations.

Not Understanding the Non-Linear Relationship

Remember that the relationship between features and probability is non-linear due to the sigmoid function. The same change in a feature has a larger effect on probability when p ≈ 0.5 than when p is near 0 or 1. The sigmoid function has the steepest slope at z = 0 (p = 0.5) and flattens out at the extremes. This means coefficient effects are not constant across all probability values. Always visualize the sigmoid curve to understand how probabilities change as features vary, and remember that the effect depends on the current probability value.

Advanced Tips & Strategies

Understand the Three-Step Prediction Process

Always remember the three-step process: (1) Compute linear predictor z = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + ..., (2) Transform through sigmoid to get probability p = σ(z) = 1 / (1 + e^(-z)), (3) Apply threshold to get predicted class ŷ = 1 if p ≥ threshold, else 0. The linear predictor combines features with coefficients, the sigmoid function constrains output to [0, 1], and the threshold converts probability to a binary decision. Understanding this process helps you interpret results and debug predictions.

Use Odds Ratios for More Intuitive Interpretation

Use odds ratios (e^β) for more intuitive coefficient interpretation. An odds ratio of 1.65 means a one-unit increase multiplies the odds by 1.65 (65% increase), while an odds ratio of 0.74 means a 26% decrease. Odds ratios are often more interpretable than coefficients, especially in medical and social science applications. Remember that odds ratios are multiplicative, not additive. Always compute odds ratios when explaining coefficient effects to non-technical audiences.

Visualize the Sigmoid Curve to Understand Non-Linearity

Use the chart visualization to see how probabilities change as features vary. The S-shaped sigmoid curve shows the non-linear relationship—the steepest slope is at z = 0 (p = 0.5), and it flattens out at the extremes. This helps you understand that coefficient effects depend on the current probability value. The threshold line shows where classification switches from 0 to 1. Visualizing the curve helps you understand how logistic regression makes predictions and why the relationship is non-linear.

Choose Thresholds Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis

Choose classification thresholds based on the relative costs of false positives and false negatives. Lower thresholds (e.g., 0.3) when missing positives is costly (medical diagnosis, fraud detection), raise thresholds (e.g., 0.7) when false positives are costly (spam detection, loan approval). In practice, use ROC curves, precision-recall curves, or cost-sensitive analysis to find the optimal threshold. The threshold doesn't affect probability calculation—it only affects the final classification decision. Always consider the specific context and costs when choosing a threshold.

Understand How Coefficient Magnitude Affects Predictions

Understand that larger absolute coefficient values produce stronger effects on predictions. Positive coefficients increase probability, negative coefficients decrease it. The effect is non-linear due to the sigmoid function—the same change in z has a larger effect on probability when p ≈ 0.5 than when p is near 0 or 1. Experiment with different coefficient values to see how they affect predictions. Remember that coefficient interpretation depends on the feature scale—standardizing features can help with interpretation.

Explore Multi-Feature Interactions

Use the 3-input mode to explore how multiple features interact in determining probabilities. With multiple features, you can model scenarios where the outcome depends on several factors simultaneously—like predicting loan default based on income, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio. This demonstrates the multivariate nature of real logistic regression models. Experiment with different feature combinations to see how they jointly affect predictions. Remember that features are combined additively in the linear predictor, but the sigmoid function creates non-linear interactions in probability space.

Remember This Is Educational Only

Always remember that this tool is strictly for educational purposes. Real logistic regression models require: (1) proper training data, (2) maximum likelihood estimation to find coefficients, (3) model validation on held-out data, (4) statistical inference (confidence intervals, p-values), (5) model diagnostics (ROC curves, calibration plots), (6) assessment of assumptions, and (7) domain expertise. Never use manually-entered coefficients for real decisions. Always use validated statistical software and consult domain experts for important applications.

Limitations & Assumptions

• Hypothetical Coefficients Only: This tool uses manually-entered coefficients for demonstration purposes. In real applications, coefficients are estimated from training data using maximum likelihood estimation, validated on held-out data, and come with confidence intervals. Results from this tool cannot be used for actual predictions.

• Linearity in Log-Odds Assumption: Logistic regression assumes the log-odds of the outcome is a linear function of the predictors. If the true relationship is non-linear, the model may provide poor predictions. Real applications require checking this assumption through diagnostic tests.

• Independence of Observations: The model assumes each observation is independent. Clustered or repeated-measures data violates this assumption and requires specialized methods such as mixed-effects logistic regression or GEE.

• Binary Classification Only: This tool handles only binary outcomes (two classes). Multi-class classification problems require multinomial logistic regression or other multi-class methods not covered here.

Important Note: This calculator is strictly for educational and informational purposes only. It demonstrates how logistic regression predictions work conceptually, not for actual decision-making. For real-world applications involving credit scoring, medical diagnosis, customer churn prediction, or any consequential decisions, use professional statistical software such as R, Python (scikit-learn, statsmodels), SAS, or SPSS with properly trained and validated models. Always consult with qualified statisticians or data scientists for production machine learning systems.

Important Limitations and Disclaimers

  • This calculator is strictly an educational tool designed to help you understand logistic regression and verify your work. The coefficients you enter are hypothetical values for demonstration. In real applications, coefficients are estimated from training data using maximum likelihood estimation, validated on held-out data, and have uncertainty (confidence intervals). Always verify important results independently.
  • NEVER use this tool for real medical, financial, legal, hiring, or consequential decisions. Real logistic regression models require proper training data, model validation, feature engineering, assessment of assumptions, and domain expertise. Always use validated statistical software and consult domain experts for important decisions.
  • Real logistic regression models require: (1) proper training data with known outcomes, (2) maximum likelihood estimation to find optimal coefficients, (3) model validation on held-out data, (4) statistical inference (confidence intervals, p-values, hypothesis tests), (5) model diagnostics (ROC curves, AUC, calibration plots, residual analysis), (6) assessment of model assumptions, and (7) domain expertise. This tool does none of these—it only demonstrates how predictions are made given coefficients.
  • The calculator uses numerically stable methods for sigmoid and log-odds calculations, with probability clamping to avoid numerical overflow. The precision is sufficient for most educational purposes, but extremely large or small values may have slight numerical precision limitations. The calculations are deterministic—given the same inputs and coefficients, you always get the same probability and prediction.
  • This tool is for informational and educational purposes only. It should NOT be used for critical decision-making, medical diagnosis, financial planning, legal advice, hiring decisions, or any professional/legal purposes without independent verification. Consult with appropriate professionals (statisticians, domain experts, medical professionals, financial advisors) for important decisions.
  • Results calculated by this tool are theoretical predictions based on hypothetical coefficients and your specified feature values. Actual outcomes in real-world scenarios may differ due to additional factors, model limitations, violations of assumptions, or errors in coefficient estimation not captured in this simple demonstration tool. Use predictions as guides for understanding logistic regression, not guarantees of specific outcomes.

Sources & References

The mathematical formulas and machine learning concepts used in this calculator are based on established statistical theory and authoritative academic sources:

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about logistic regression, binary classification, sigmoid function, log-odds, odds ratios, classification thresholds, coefficients interpretation, and how to use this educational tool for homework and machine learning practice.

What is the difference between logistic regression and linear regression?

Linear regression predicts continuous numeric values (like price or temperature), while logistic regression predicts the probability of a binary outcome (like yes/no or pass/fail). Logistic regression uses the sigmoid function to constrain outputs between 0 and 1, making it suitable for classification tasks.

Why do we use the sigmoid function?

The sigmoid function σ(z) = 1/(1+e⁻ᶻ) transforms any real number into a value between 0 and 1, which can be interpreted as a probability. It's smooth, differentiable (important for optimization), and has a natural interpretation: large positive z values give probabilities near 1, large negative values give probabilities near 0, and z=0 gives exactly 0.5.

What do the coefficients (β values) represent?

Each coefficient represents the change in log-odds for a one-unit increase in its corresponding feature. The intercept (β₀) is the log-odds when all features are zero. Positive coefficients increase the probability of class 1, while negative coefficients decrease it. The magnitude indicates the strength of the effect.

What is log-odds and why do we use it?

Log-odds (or logit) is the natural logarithm of the odds ratio: log(p/(1-p)). We use it because it transforms probabilities (bounded 0-1) into an unbounded scale (-∞ to +∞), allowing us to model them with a linear combination of features. The logistic regression directly models the log-odds as a linear function.

How do I choose the right threshold?

The default threshold of 0.5 treats false positives and false negatives equally. Lower it (e.g., 0.3) when missing positives is costly (medical diagnosis), raise it (e.g., 0.7) when false positives are costly (spam detection with important emails). In practice, you'd use ROC curves and consider the specific costs of different error types.

Can I use this calculator for real predictions?

No! This is strictly an educational tool. The coefficients you enter are hypothetical. Real logistic regression models must be trained on data using maximum likelihood estimation, validated on held-out data, and their coefficients have uncertainty (confidence intervals). Never use manually-entered coefficients for real decisions.

What is an odds ratio?

The odds ratio for a coefficient is e^β. It tells you how much the odds multiply for each one-unit increase in that feature. For example, if β=0.7, the odds ratio is e^0.7 ≈ 2.01, meaning the odds of the positive class roughly double for each one-unit increase. An odds ratio of 1 means no effect.

Why might I want 3 inputs instead of 2?

More features allow you to explore how multiple factors interact in determining the probability. With 3 inputs, you can model scenarios where the outcome depends on multiple independent variables—like predicting loan default based on income, credit score, and debt-to-income ratio. This demonstrates the multivariate nature of real models.

What does the sigmoid curve visualization show?

The chart shows how the predicted probability changes as one feature varies while others stay constant. The S-shaped curve is characteristic of logistic regression. The steepness depends on the coefficient magnitude. The threshold line shows where the classification switches from 0 to 1.

How are real logistic regression coefficients estimated?

Real coefficients are estimated using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), which finds coefficient values that maximize the probability of observing the training data. This is typically done using iterative optimization algorithms like Newton-Raphson or gradient descent. The process also produces standard errors and confidence intervals for each coefficient.

How helpful was this calculator?

Logistic Regression Simple Predictor | Educational Binary Classification Demo | EverydayBudd